As
with many things, the introduction of the wide use of computers in business has
strongly increased the availability of business
intelligence. Business intelligence, also referred to as BI, is a combination of
technologies, theories, and architectures that have the ability to transform
raw data into meaningful and useful information for business to utilize. More
simply put, CIO.com defines it as “an umbrella term that refers to a variety of
software applications used to analyze an organization’s raw data. BI as a
discipline is made up of several related activities, including data mining,
online analytical processing, querying and reporting” (Mulcahy; CIO.com). Business intelligence has the
ability to handle an incredibly large amount of amorphous data that it is then
able to utilize to develop, identify, and create new strategic business
opportunities. The use of business intelligence allows a company to easily
interpret large volumes of this data (Wikipedia, 2014). This can allow those
employed with a company to more easily identify new opportunities and then
implement an effective strategy, providing a competitive market advantage and
long-term stability.
According to research from the
analyst firm Gartner, between 70% and 80% of corporate business intelligence
projects fail (Goodwin, 2011). This
large failure rate is due mainly to a combination of poor communication between
the business and IT and the failure by the organization “to ask the right
questions or to think about the real needs of the business” (Goodwin, 2011). According
to Robert Miller, in Tech Decision Maker (2011), implementation issues include
a lack of the following:
- Defined functional groups – These are very important because different business units use information for different purposes. If these groups are not accurately divided into functional groups, the BI users will not know their roles or be invested in the successful implementation. These functional groups must also be trained effectively (Mulcahy). Poor training will certainly negatively affect implementation.
- Common ground – This means that all functional groups agree on the meaning of key terms, such as gross profit and gross margin. Without such an agreement, a language barrier develops hindering successful implementation.
- Clear conceptual mapping – The whole project should be mapped out, with a clear beginning and end. Additionally, since each functional group uses the information differently, BI objectives should be mapped out to show how each group will use the information, which will allow for better decision making. Clearly define the ROI, outlining specific benefits the organization expects to achieve on a time line (Mulcahy).
- Organically related data –The reporting from BI depends on accurate and reliable data, therefore, BI and the data must be in sync and the data must be clean.
- Tools selection – BI components, such as data integration, analytics, and portals, should be cataloged because each affects the successful implementation.
- Technology partner – A vendor should be selected that is “both knowledgeable in the advancement of both relevant software and hardware components and equally well versed in end user requirements and objectives” to support the organization. A lack of knowledgeable support can significantly hinder an organization in the time it takes to complete tasks.
- Evolving deliverables – There will be timelines and due dates set for the implementation. It is important that the organization keeps to the preselected milestones to get the implementation started. Adjustments can be made as needed.
Check out this video from Gartner
analysts on poor communication between the business and IT and the importance
of tools selection:
http://bcove.me/8xyfs0js
http://bcove.me/8xyfs0js
<embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/1156010110" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=741282639001&playerId=1156010110&viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://console.brightcove.com/services/amfgateway&servicesURL=http://services.brightcove.com/services&cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&domain=embed&autoStart=false&" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="510" height="610" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed>
Cultural issues can also hinder
successful implementation. People can be
resistant to change and learning new things.
They don’t want to learn new things or change the way they do something
unless the current way doesn’t work anymore or is extremely time
consuming. Also, if users do not see the
benefits of implementing BI and think the challenges of learning it and getting
comfortable with it outweigh the benefits, then successful implementation is
not likely. End users must be behind the
initiative and support it, or it is not going to work. (Rabie, 2010)
Even
though the implementation and use of BI has become more widespread and more
accessible, it is still something that can cost a pretty penny to implement
into the everyday use in a business.
With BI, there is a large range of options, though. Boris Evelson, in his blog, tried to come to
a conclusion on how much a single BI report can cost a company. His analysis shows the complexity and range
of putting a cost on business intelligence.
His range was from $1,840 for a single report carried out by a single
FTE, all the way up past $15,000 if looked at from a top down fully loaded
analysis of creating one BI report (Evelson; Forrester) The rule of
thumb for business intelligence, as mentioned by James Standen, is that cost of
effort and service is five times the software costs (Standen; Datamartist). The Computer
World report prepared this chart, showing the difference in how small
companies are choosing to fund their BI centers versus larger companies:
This shows that companies are realizing how
important it is to invest into BI and are finding their own ways to fit the
bill to make it work.
The
benefits for investing in business intelligence are wide ranging, but seem to
be very similar within the different sizes of businesses. Within the same ComputerWorld report, they took a look at how the two different
sized companies felt they would benefit by investing into BI.
To simply list the ways companies believe they would
benefit from BI does not simply do it justice.
Being a visual person myself, I like to present examples for how things
would work in real life. The following
is a chart used in a case study by Borut Hočevar and Jurij Jaklič titled
“Assessing Benefits of Business Intelligence Systems – A Case Study”. The chart they used was originally used by Caver
& Ritacco 2006.
The flow chart shows a detailed example of how one
would use BI to investigate a simple problem by digging deep to find the
original source. While this is just one
small example of how BI is used in business, it does show how it looks much
deeper than one usually looks and it is a way to increase sales and business
efficiency.
References:
Goodwin, B. (2011, January 10). Poor communication
to blame for business intelligence failure, says Gartner. ComputerWeekly.com.
Retrieved June 25, 2014, from http://www.computerweekly.com/news/1280094776/Poor-communication-to-blame-for-business-intelligence-failure-says-Gartner
Miller, R. (2011, September 13). Successful BI
deployments have these elements. TechRepublic. Retrieved June 22, 2014, from http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/tech-decision-maker/successful-bi-deployments-have-these-elements/?tag=content%3Bsiu-container
Mulcahy, R. (n.d.). Business Intelligence Definition
and Solutions. CIO. Retrieved June 22, 2014, from http://www.cio.com/article/40296/Business_Intelligence_Definition_and_Solutions?page=4&taxonomyId=3002
Rabie,
G. (2010, August 9). 10 Reasons Why BI Projects Worry IT Managers. Yellowfin.
Retrieved June 22, 2014, from https://www.yellowfinbi.com/YFCommunityNews-10-Reasons-Why-BI-Projects-Worry-IT-Managers-74171
Evelson,
Boris. “Bottom Up and Top Down
Approaches to Estimating Costs for a Single BI Report.”
Forrester.com.
Accessed on June 21, 2014
Standen,
James. “Estimating the Cost of Business Intelligence.” Datamartist. Accessed on June 22,
Mulcahy,
Ryan. “Business Intelligence Definition
and Solutions.” CIO.com. Accessed on June
22,
Computer World. “How Companies are Implementing
Business Intelligence Competency Centers
(BICCs).” Accessed on June 22, 2014 http://www.computerworld.com/pdfs/SAS_Intel_BICC.pdf
Hočevar, Borut
& Jurij Jaklič. “Assessing Benefits
of Business Intelligence Systems – A Case
Study.” Accessed on June
22, 2014 https://www.efst.hr/management/Vol15No1-20 /5-Hocevar_Jaklic nfinal.pdf
While I agree with this blog entry, it seems as if BI brings more trouble than it fixes. I agree that in order to have a successful BI system all the components listed in the blog are very important. But first the business should decide if BI implementation is even worth the battle, because as the article says, about 70% of BI implementations fail. The implementation might be difficult as discussed throughout the blog, but there is nothing written in relation to why companies invest in BI. Though there were some factors that were written in your sources that touched on these subjects that weren’t discussed in the blog. The first are the business factors; when looking at whether the company should invest in a specific BI, they should look at the four components for “justification” of BI that were discussed by Hočevar, Borut & Jurij Jaklič. First, the BI should help the business be in line with strategic goals of the organization. Second the BI should service the requirements of business analyses, where the data is analyzed in order to facilitate and support the decision making process of managers. Next, the cost and analysis portion of the BI; the investors should know what the maintenance and implementation costs are of the system, as well as the measurable benefits of it. Lastly, a risk assessment should be done in order to analyze the risks regarding the technology and the complexity of the system and the ease of integration of the current system. Overall I did learn some things from your post, even though I would have looked at it from a little different perspective.
ReplyDelete-Group #8